I am a PhD-researcher at EUI LAW working on a thesis on contemporary pressures on the European Court of Human Rights. I deal with questions of legitimacy and effective adjudication in the face of caseload pressure and politicization of judicial bodies, as well as how the Court might respond adjudicatively. I’m particularly interested in the role of the language and practice of deference. I utilize mixed quantitative and qualitative methodologies.
In addition to conducting research, I’m the Editor-in-Chief at the European Journal of Legal Studies. You can find out more about the journal and get in touch with us here: ejls.eui.eu.
I’m also part of the coordinating committee for the European Society of International Law’s Early Career Researchers Network. You can learn more about our work here: https://esil-sedi.eu/young-esil/ or get in touch with us at [email protected] or at https://twitter.com/ESILEarlyCareer.
The best way to reach me directly is through email: [email protected] At the moment, however, I am on maternity leave and may be more difficult to reach than normally.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga. ‘Subsidiarity does not win cases: A mixed methods study of the relationship between margin of appreciation language and deference at the European Court of Human Rights’. Leiden Journal of International Law (2022): 1-25.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘Dealing with really good bad faith interpreters: M.A. v Denmark’. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law. 37(1).
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘Who is responsible for the protection of human rights in Kosovo?’. Nordisk østforum. Vol. 34. 2020. Norway.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘In defence of the dynamic interpretation tradition at the European Court of Human Rights’. The Universal. Vol 2. 2018. Denmark.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘Politicisation of Enlargement: The future of the Balkans in Europe.’ Bezbednosni dijalozi. Vol 8(2). 2017. Skopje University. North Macedonia.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘The prohibition of retroactive law and other safeguards when conducting institutional reform: The right to non-recurrence in Bosnia-Herzegovina.’ International Journal on Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights. Vol 7. December 2016. Pp. 138-146. Bosnia-Hercegovina.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘Reviewing the narrative of the double standard Europe concerning collective minority rights’. International Journal on Rule of Law, Transitional Justice of Human Rights. Vol. 6. December 2015. pp. 13-27. Bosnia-Hercegovina.
Book-chapters and working papers
Forthcoming: Molbæk-Steensig, Helga and Alexandre Quemy: Artificial Intelligence and Fair Trial Rights, In: Quintavalla, Alberto and Jeroen Temperman, Human Rights and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. 2022.
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘The Copenhagen Declaration: Wrapping up the Interlaken Reform?’, in Stephanie Schiedermair, Schwarz, Alexander, Steiger, Dominik, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Nomos. 2022.
Scheinin, Martin and Helga Molbæk-Steensig: ‘Pandemics and Human Rights: Three perspectives on human rights assessment of strategies against COVID-19’. EUI Department of Law Research Paper 01/2021.
Scheinin, Martin and Helga Molbæk-Steensig: ‘Human rights-based versus populist responses to the pandemic’. In Morten Kjaerum, Martha F. Davis, Amanda Lyons: COVID-19 and Human Rights. 2021
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga: ‘Kosovo og the oddities of
not being a recognised state’. In: Bülent Ağir (ed.): Kosovo: Past,
Present og Future. Nova. 2019
‘Globalising transitional justice: Contemporary Essays’ by Ruti Teitel.’ International Journal on Rule of Law, Transitional Justice og Human Rights. Vol. 8. December
2017. Pp 148-155.
Molbæk-Steensig: ‘Did we solve the case load problem? Russia’s exit from the ECtHR’. 24.03.2022. EUIdeas. Available: https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/03/24/did-we-solve-the-caseload-problem-russias-exit-from-the-european-court-of-human-rights/
Molbæk-Steensig: ‘Is Denmark (still) a good-faith interpreter with legitimate aims?’. 21.11.2021. Strasbourg Observers. Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/09/21/m-a-v-denmark-is-denmark-still-a-good-faith-interpreter-with-legitimate-aims/
Molbæk-Steensig: Particularities in the challenge to the rule of law in Eastern Europe. 25.3.2020. Populism Archives. Constitutionalism and Politics Blog EUI. Available at: https://blogs.eui.eu/constitutionalism-politics-working-group/particularities-challenge-rule-law-eastern-europe/
Molbæk-Steensig: ‘Something Rotten in the State of Denmark?’. 26.4.2018. Verfassungsblog. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/something-rotten-in-the-state-of-denmark/, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20180426-124756.
2017-2019: Legal philosophy and legal sociology (Ret, Moral og Politik): 6th sememster Bachelor of law, Copenhagen University Faculty of law.
2016-2018: Fundamental rights of the individual in the Danish Constitution and in the European Convention on Human Rights (Individets Grundlæggende Rettigheder). 2nd semester Bachelor of Law, Copenhagen University Faculty of law.
2019: Populism & Nationalism. At the People’s University (Folkeuniversitetet). Copenhagen University.
2019: Foreign policy for the EU. People’s University (Folkeuniversitetet). University of Southern Denmark, Kolding.
1st International Summer School on Human Rights Protection under the ECHR: The reform process at the ECtHR. Leipzig University. September 2019
International Sarajevo Summer School: The populist threat to transitional justice. Sarajevo University. July 2017.
Copenhagen University, Institute of Cross-Cultural studies: Minority rights in Croatia. 14. November 2016.